1.IPS-15-3 EuropePushing the Thermal Limit of HMX Perforating Systems in Through-Tubing Gas Wells
Dominic Wong
Regional TCP Manager – ESSA
May 20, 2015
2.Introduction
Through-tubing perforating systems based on HMX explosive are commonly deployed for gas well perforating
Important to consider jobs above 360 F at depths around 15,000 ft
Large body of operational data shows a typical transit time to be 1.0 hr, with another 0.5 hr for tie-in time and shooting.
Total time of 1.5 hr is nearing the HMX thermal limit.
3.Background
4.Goal of this test program
Determine the thermal delay inside the perforating gun.
Conduct tests to take advantage of the delay so that the thermal limit of the HMX charges can be “pushed” as much as possible before requiring a switch to HNS.
Determine the performance of the HMX charges as a function of temperature.
This phase concentrated on charge performance in aluminum targets. Follow-on phases are underway for HMX detonators and detonating cord, as well as HMX charge performance in stressed rock.
5.Experimental Setup for Simulated Gas Well
First step was to measure thermal delay inside 2-in OD x 7 ft length gun
Eleven thermocouples positioned at various locations
Linear heating ramp programmed to match 1:00 hr transit time
6.Setup inside oven
Thermocouple
Thermocouple
7.Full set of temperature curves
Thermal delay inside gun at 1.5 hr
8.Thermal delay at center charge vs gas well temperature
10.Two-step heating method used to thermally equate shooting fixture with actual gun system
Necessary due to thermal difference between mass of shooting fixture and mass of gun
Fixture was necessarily large for safety reasons when pushing the limit of HMX (which is also beyond the delta phase transition temperature)
11.Simulated Gas Well
With Perforating Gun
Well temp
profile
Transit time
1:05 hr
Shooting time
0:30 hr later
380 F
Charge temp profile
A
B
- 1 -
12.Simulated Gas Well
With Perforating Gun
Well temp
profile
Transit time
1:05 hr
Shooting time
0:30 hr later
380 F
Charge temp profile
A
B
1
2
- 2 -
13.Well temp
profile
Transit time
1:05 hr
Shooting time
0:30 hr later
380 F
Charge temp profile
Oven temp
Charge temp
A
B
C
D
1
2
Simulated Gas Well
With Perforating Gun
Shooting Fixture
Inside Oven
- 3 -
14.Well temp
profile
Transit time
1:05 hr
Shooting time
0:30 hr later
380 F
Charge temp profile
Oven temp
Charge temp
368 F
A
B
C
D
4
1
2
3
Simulated Gas Well
With Perforating Gun
Shooting Fixture
Inside Oven
- 4 -
15.Well temp
profile
Transit time
1:05 hr
Shooting time
0:30 hr later
380 F
Charge temp profile
Oven temp
Charge temp
368 F
A
B
C
D
4
1
2
3
Simulated Gas Well
With Perforating Gun
Shooting Fixture
Inside Oven
0.002% decomposition
- 5 -
16.Well temp
profile
Transit time
1:05 hr
Shooting time
0:30 hr later
380 F
Charge temp profile
Oven temp
Charge temp
368 F
A
B
C
D
4
1
2
3
Simulated Gas Well
With Perforating Gun
Shooting Fixture
Inside Oven
0.010% decomposition
- 6 -
17.Results
Low-order firing
18.Conclusions
For all simulated BHTs, there was a thermal delay in the interior of the gun
At the 1:30 hr exposure, the temperature of the center charge was still cooler than BHT by 12-25 F
By 2:00 hr, however, the entire gun had essentially reached thermal equilibrium with the BHT
The HMX limit for the gun can be pushed, however, this advantage must be taken within the 1:30 hr timeframe
At the 1:30 hr time, the upper limit for charge all-fire was 420 F BHT
Important to note that the results from this test program are applicable to gas wells only
The heat transfer characteristics of oil wells will be different, thereby giving different thermal delays and correspondingly different charge response