Download

2012 AOR - How Recycling Managers Can Best Contribute to Achieving Sustainable Materials Management

Upload
0
Embed
Share
Upload and view presentations on any device and embed the player to your website! --- > >
Upload PPT
Upload PPT

Download this Presentation

winnie

2021-9-26 published at Product Training/ Manuals category

Presentation Transcript

1.How Recycling Managers Can Best Contribute to Achieving Sustainable Materials Management February 18, 2015 David Allaway, Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality
2.Overview What is “materials management”? Materials management and discards management compared How does recycling contribute to sustainable materials management
3.Materials Management: 2 Working Definitions (US EPA) “Materials management is an approach to using and reusing resources most efficiently and sustainably throughout their lifecycles. It seeks to minimize materials used and all associated environmental impacts.” “Materials management refers to the life cycle of materials as they trace their course through the economy, from raw material extraction to product manufacture, transport, use, source reduction, reuse, recycling, and disposal.” 3
4.Materials Management: A “Life Cycle” View Recovery
5.“Discards management” and “materials management” compared 5
6.Materials Management?
7.Why Materials Management? Answers Complex Questions about Choices and Impact - Everyday, people make choices about products and services: Which products do we buy? What are they made of and how are they made? How do we use them? What do we do with stuff when we’re through with it? All of these choices have environmental consequences – some large, some small, almost all unseen. Multi-attribute - Very narrowly focused attributes like “recyclable”, “biodegradable”, or “organic” don’t tell us about all of the other potential environmental impacts that occur in all stages of the life cycle. Offers Inter-related Solutions - SMM requires interaction between programs that deal with a wide range of media (air, water, etc.) to identify and address "hotspots" which cause major environmental impacts. Source: US EPA (2015)
8.From “Discards Management” to “Materials Management: A full view of impacts across the life cycle A full view of actions across the life cycle
9.From “Discards Management” to “Materials Management:
10.From “Discards Management” to “Materials Management:
11.From “Discards Management” to “Materials Management: A full view of impacts across the life cycle A full view of actions across the life cycle Why? Because most impacts are “upstream”
12.Example of Actions Across the Life Cycle: PET Water Bottles “Baseline” = PET, half-liter, 13.3 grams, 0% post-consumer recycled content (PCR), on-site molding, purified municipal water (reverse osmosis, ozone and uv), 50 miles to retail, 5 miles home-to-retail, co-purchase w/24 other products, no chilling. Normalized impact (baseline w/37% recycling = 100)
13.Example of Actions Across the Life Cycle: PET Water Bottles “Baseline” = PET, half-liter, 13.3 grams, 0% post-consumer recycled content (PCR), on-site molding, purified municipal water (reverse osmosis, ozone and uv), 50 miles to retail, 5 miles home-to-retail, co-purchase w/24 other products, no chilling. Normalized impact (baseline w/37% recycling = 100)
14.Example of Actions Across the Life Cycle: PET Water Bottles “Baseline” = PET, half-liter, 13.3 grams, 0% post-consumer recycled content (PCR), on-site molding, purified municipal water (reverse osmosis, ozone and uv), 50 miles to retail, 5 miles home-to-retail, co-purchase w/24 other products, no chilling. Normalized impact (baseline w/37% recycling = 100)
15.Example of Actions Across the Life Cycle: PET Water Bottles “Baseline” = PET, half-liter, 13.3 grams, 0% post-consumer recycled content (PCR), on-site molding, purified municipal water (reverse osmosis, ozone and uv), 50 miles to retail, 5 miles home-to-retail, co-purchase w/24 other products, no chilling. Normalized impact (baseline w/37% recycling = 100)
16.The “Solid Waste Management” Hierarchy
17.Materials Management Recovery
18.
19.Nicolaus Copernicus
20.World View #1: Recycling is Independent of Other Life Cycle Stages The life cycle of materials consists of several discrete parts (production, transportation, end-of-life, etc.) If each part is optimized (independent of its effects on the larger system), the whole system is optimized Recyclers should maximize recycling
21.World View #2: “Systems Thinking” The life cycle of materials consists of several discrete parts (production, transportation, end-of-life, etc.) Recycling is a means to an end, not an end in-and-of-itself Recycling may effect the rest of the system Recycling should be maximized but only to the extent it achieves the broader end (e.g., resource conservation), and only after considering how it effects the big picture (whole system)
22.Design for Recycling? Design for Prevention? Design for Environment? Source: US EPA
23.The “Solid Waste Management” Hierarchy DEQ Waste Prevention Strategy: www.deq.state.or.us/lq/sw/wasteprevention/wpstrategy.htm
24.Food for Thought “The environmental goals that motivate recycling are often best served by less rather than more recycling – that is, by preventing the generation of waste in the first place.” -Frank Ackerman (in “Why Do We Recycle?”) “Picking up and reclaiming scrap left over after production is a public service, but planning so that there will be no scrap is a higher public service.” - Henry Ford
25.
26.Thank You David Allaway Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality allaway.david@deq.state.or.us

Latest Release